Since last Saturday's attempted bombing of Times Square in New York, the left has salivated with the completely fabricated thought that the perpetrator might have been a Tea Partier. With absolutely ZERO evidence to corroborate their fantasies, some were so bold as to make the accusation. Take Michael Bloomberg, for instance. What a moron! His speculation was completely without one molecule of evidence. Bloomberg said the bomber may have been:
...a mentally deranged person or somebody with a political agenda that doesn’t like the health-care bill or something.Hey Mikey! It also could have been your mother. I have as much evidence to support that as you do your ridiculous, biased, hateful nonsense.
Contessa Brewer on MSNBC was "frustrated" because the would-be bomber was a Muslim.
I get frustrated and there was part of me that was hoping this was not going to be anybody with ties to any kind of Islamic country.Uh, Contessa. What were you hoping? That it would be a racist, homophobic, anti-Obama, Tea Partier? They're all violent anyway, right?
Back in 2009, Newsweek editor Evan Thomas said regarding another Islamic terrorist:
I cringe that he's a Muslim. I mean, because it inflames all the fears. I think he's probably just a nut case.Okay Evan. Let me ask you a question. If this person had been a Tea Partier, would you have said he was "just a nut case?" No, you would you painted the entire Tea Party movement as this person. They would all have been labeled violent extremists.
I love pointing out hypocrisy and double standards, especially in the media. The funniest this is these morons think they have us fooled.